State v. Palmer’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
148 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 148 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably 184 Ohio App. 3d 675 - State v. Pilgrim (2009), Risner v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Ohio Div. of Wildlife (Slip Opinion) (2015)
148 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 32 Ohio St. 3d 1 - City of Lakewood v. Papadelis · Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy District · State v. Brown · State v. Sanchez · 56 Ohio St. 2d 328 - State v. Howard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 148 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he failure of a criminal defendant to respond within a reasonable time to a prosecution request for reciprocal discovery constitutes neglect that tolls the running of speedy-trial time pursuant to R.C. 2945.72(D).”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“a trial court shall determine the date by which the defendant should reasonably have responded to a reciprocal discovery request based on the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, including the time established for response by local rule, if applicable.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“the tolling of statutory speedy-trial time based on a defendant's neglect in failing to respond within a reasonable time to a prosecution request for discovery is not dependent upon the filing of a motion to compel discovery by the prosecution.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.