Gehm v. Timberline Post & Frame’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
76 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably Ohio Pyro, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Commerce (2007), In re A.J.S. (2008)
76 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on General Accident Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North America · Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ. · State v. Muncie · State ex rel. Scruggs v. Sadler · Howell v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“affirm, modify, or reverse judgments or final orders of the courts of record inferior to the court of appeals within the district.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“(B) An order is a final order that may be reviewed, affirmed, modified, or reversed, with or without retrial, when it is one of the following: * * * (2) An order that affects a substantial right in an action made in a special proceeding or upon a summary application in an action after judgment; * * * (4) An order that grants or denies a provisional remedy and to which both of the following apply: (a) The order in effect determines the action with respect to the provisional remedy and prevents a judgment in the action in favor of the appealing party with respect to the provisional remedy. (b) The appealing party would not be afforded a meaningful or effective remedy by an appeal following final judgment as to all proceedings, issues, claims, and parties in the action.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.