Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 SO2D 257 - State v. Schroeder

State v. Schroeder’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2009

23 state decisions

110195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Counselman v. Hitchcock · State v. Faulkner · Johnson v. State · Mercer v. State · 54 So. 2d 179 - State Ex Rel. Byer v. Willard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a court will not, for the purpose of determining a motion to quash, consider the legality, character, or sufficiency of the evidence upon which an indictment or information is based,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Immunity from prosecution is a creature of statute”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a court for the purpose of quashing an indictment will never inquire into the character of the evidence that influenced a grand jury in finding such indictment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.