112 So. 2d 284 - Bedami v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"We are unable to read into these constitutional provisions, supra, or statutes controlling the subject, or the previous decisions of this court, the requirements, that the information so filed by a solicitor of the Criminal Court of Record shall be based solely and exclusively upon the testimony taken before him. Such a construction thereof is not warranted, nor justified by any reasonable inferences drawn therefrom."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 153 So. 2d 854 - State v. McInnes

2. “the proceedings involving statements of witnesses taken before the Solicitor of the Criminal Court of Record are not official documents or judicial findings as involved in this case but are in effect the work product of the officer and not similar to evidence before a grand jury.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Colebrook v. State

3. “"The judicial history of informations does not bear out the contention of the petitioner that a solicitor may file an information only upon sworn testimony before him or upon an indictment of a grand jury certified to the criminal court."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 153 So. 2d 854 - State v. McInnes