Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 So. 2d 395 - Malcolm v. Smith

112 So. 2d 395 - Malcolm v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pierro v. Baxendale · Parrish v. Newbury · 36 N.J. Super. 46 - Schermer v. Fremar Corp. · Luedke v. Carlson · Maturi v. Balint

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Motels are business institutions which cater to members of the general public ... as such business institutions they possess, in substantial degree the attributes which have led to the exclusion of businesses generally from residential zones.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “and other land shown on the plat was divided into lots and blocks. Several lots were conveyed subject to a restriction which prohibited clothes lines to be maintained thereon but permitted the owners to use the public clothes lines on the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “maintain, free of commercial features, a pleasant residential trailer community throughout the whole of lands included within the platted area.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.