Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 SO2D 63 - Bell v. Bell

Bell v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
December 1985
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 1985

20 state decisions

1301959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strauss v. Strauss · 39 So. 2d 554 - Yandell v. Yandell · Stelz v. . Shreck · Hollywood, Inc. v. Clark · Andrews v. Andrews

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * that the chancellor abused his discretion in granting the wife custody of the two minor children of the parties, permanent alimony, court costs, one half of the proceeds from the forced sale of the parties' New York home, permanent mortgage payments on the home, insurance benefits, and counsel fees, * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.