Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

112 So. 3d 538

Oliver v. Oliver

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-03-15

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2014

3 state decisions

Relies on Hill v. Hill

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-03-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1John A. Oliver, the former husband, appeals a final judgment dissolving his marriage to Mary Anne Oliver, the former wife. We affirm the final judgment, but modify one provision. The final judgment required the former husband to reimburse the former wife seventy-five percent of the cost of any medical expenses incurred by the minor or dependent children. We modify this provision to apply only to non-elective reasonable and necessary medical expenses. The former husband is not responsible for elective medical procedures, absent his express agreement or court order. See Hill v. Hill, 706 So.2d 406, 407 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

¶2AFFIRMED as MODIFIED.

ORFINGER, C.J., GRIFFIN and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
/112/so3d/538 · .json · Public domain