¶1Pedrp Sbert appeals an order related to timesharing of his minor son. As the order expressly contemplates further judicial labor, we dismiss the appeal as premature. This dismissal is without prejudice to appeal this issue upon rendition of a final order. See Moore v. Moore, 50 So.3d 110, 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“A judgment that reserves jurisdiction over an integrally related issue is not a final appealable order.”).
112 So. 3d 741
Sbert v. Labrada
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 8, 2013
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-05-08
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2018
2 state decisions
Relies on 50 So. 3d 110 - Moore v. Moore
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2013-05-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →