Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 Tex. Crim. 506 - Spears v. State

112 Tex. Crim. 506 - Spears v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 1998
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1998

3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

3019291930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · 105 Tex. Crim. 568 - Battle v. State · 106 Tex. Crim. 1 - Odenthal v. State · 80 Tex. Crim. 66 - Wagner v. State · Ex parte Burton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Legislature must have meant something when it used the words, ‘or about the person,’ and, on principle, using the word ‘about’ in its ordinary meaning, taking into consideration the context and subject-matter relative to which it is employed, the word, not being specially defined, must, as we believe, be held to mean, within the pistol statute, near by, close at hand, convenient of access, and within such distance of the party so having it as that such party could, without materially changing his position, get his hand on it; otherwise every person having a vehicle would be authorized to keep prohibited weapons in his vehicle and within reach of his hand, ready for action, and thus fill our streets and highways with armed men, while peaceful pedestrians and passengers or guests in such vehicles would not be so exempt from the law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.