Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 U.S. 144 - Horbach v. Hill

Horbach v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

112 U.S. 144 · 1884

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
May 1960
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 12 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1960 · most notably Bradley Palmer v. State of Texas (1909), Schreyer v. Platt (1890)

30 federal appellate · 12 district · 9 state decisions

130188418901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · William Shields v. Robert R Barrow · Holland v. Challen · Hart v. Sansom · Russell v. Southard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““He had a right to dispose of his property in the ordinary course of business for a valuable consideration, and the defendant (the grantee) had a right to purchase it. The complainant, not showing that he was at the time a creditor,. cannot complain. Even a voluntary conveyance is good as against subsequent creditors, unless executed as a cover for future schemes of fraud.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A creditor of a grantor of real estate, attacking the conveyance as made to defraud creditors, should show affirmatively that he was a creditor of the grantor when the alleged fraudulent conveyance was made.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.