112 Wash. 2d
Volume 112 — Washington Reports, Second Series
68 opinions
- 112 Wash. 2d 1Washington Public Utility Districts' Utilities System v. Public Utility District No. 1 (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 19In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Burtch (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 30Spokane Police Guild v. Liquor Control Board (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 47Fidelity Mutual Savings Bank v. Mark (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 58City of Seattle v. Gellein (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 68Estate of Friedman v. Pierce County (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 83Babcock v. State (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 115Lynden Transport, Inc. v. State (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 127Baldwin v. Sisters of Providence in Washington, Inc. (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 140State v. Keeney (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 145Allard v. First Interstate Bank of Washington, N.A. (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 164Pierce County v. State (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 172Johnson v. Department of Employment Security (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 180State v. Rogers (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 186State v. Campbell (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 193LaMon v. Butler (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 216Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 243OTR v. Flakey Jake's, Inc. (1989)
<bold>[1] Landlord and Tenant — Assignment of Leasehold — Validity —</bold> <bold>Absence of Lessor's Consent — Assignee's Standing To</bold> <bold>Challenge.</bold> An assignee of a lessee's leasehold interest cannot challenge the validity of the assignment based on the lessor's failure to consent to the assignment in writing as required by the lease. <bold>[2] Landlord and Tenant — Assignment of Leasehold — Revocation —</bold> <bold>Nature.</bold> A revocation of an assignment of a leasehold interest for a period ending before the expiration of the lease term constitutes a sublease rather than a reassignment. <bold>[3] Landlord and Tenant — Assignment of Leasehold — Sublease —</bold> <bold>Liability of Assignee.</bold> When an assignee of a lessee's leasehold interest subleases the premises back to the lessee, privity of estate between the assignee and the lessor continues to exist, and the assignee remains liable for unlawful detainer, until the assignee tenders possession of the premises back to the lessor. SMITH, J., did not participate in the disposition of this case.
- 112 Wash. 2d 253Local 112, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Bray (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 262Housing Authority of Sunnyside v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 278Inland Empire Distribution Systems, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation Commission (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 288Lake Arrowhead Community Club, Inc. v. Looney (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 303State v. Collins (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 314Asarco, Inc. v. Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 323Obert v. Environmental Research & Development Corp. (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 341State v. Whitaker (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 347State v. Neher (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 353Providence Hospital of Everett v. Department of Social & Health Services (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 363Witters v. Commission for the Blind (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 399State v. Collicott (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 419State v. Herzog (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 433City of Everett v. Snohomish County (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 445Olympic View Water & Sewer District v. Snohomish County (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 450MSM Hauling, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industries (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 456Hite v. Public Utility District No. 2 (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 464State v. Lane (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 481In re McGrath (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 488State v. Jones (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 500Bedford v. Sugarman (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 520In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Felice (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 529Winans v. W.A.S., Inc. (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 546In Re Anderson (1989)
<bold>[1] Prisons — Disciplinary Proceeding — Due Process — Test.</bold> A prison disciplinary sanction of revoking credit for good behavior does not violate the prisoner's substantive due process rights if the record contains some or any evidence supporting the sanction imposed. This standard is met if there is some reasonable connection between the evidence and the prisoner in order to support the sanction imposed.<page_number>Page 547</page_number> <bold>[2] Criminal Law — Crimes — Elements — Possession — Constructive</bold> <bold>Possession — What Constitutes.</bold> An individual constructively possesses property if he has the ability to exercise dominion and control over the property. <bold>[3] Prisons — Safety — Interest of State.</bold> The State has a compelling interest in maintaining safety in a prison.
- 112 Wash. 2d 552Van Patten v. Jensen (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 562Pfeifer v. City of Bellingham (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 575Safeco Insurance Co. v. Barcom (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 587State v. Belieu (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 606State v. Pennington (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 612In Re Marriage of Leslie (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 621Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Hirschmann (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 621SAFECO INSURANCE CO. OF AM. v. Hirschmann (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 690Moody v. United States (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 694Washington State Hop Producers, Inc. Liquidation Trust v. Goschie Farms, Inc. (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 709Merrigan v. Epstein (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 719Department of Social & Health Services v. Chubb (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 731State v. Patterson (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 754ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. Bell (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 762Herron v. KING Broadcasting, Co. (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 794Pleas v. City of Seattle (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 819State v. Espinoza (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 829McLaughlin v. Cooke (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 841Noah v. State (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 847Washington Water Power Co. v. Graybar Electric Co. (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 867State v. Jackson (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 882State v. Bartels (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 890Gonzales v. Department of Licensing (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 906In Re Zufelt (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 915Moore v. Snohomish County (1989)
- 112 Wash. 2d 924In Re DeBruyn (1989)