112 Wash. 2d 399 - State v. Collicott’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably 125 Wash. 2d 378 - State v. Maxfield (1994), 114 Wash. 2d 6 - State v. Elliott (1990)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health · 105 Wash. 2d 175 - State v. Ammons · 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · State v. Sanwick · 99 Wash. 2d 413 - State v. Vladovic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]rial courts should focus on the extent to which the criminal intent, as objectively viewed, changed from one crime to the next. As it did in [State v. Edwards, 45 Wn. App. 378 , 725 P.2d 442 (1986)], part of this analysis will often include the related issues of whether one crime furthered the other and if the time and place of the two crimes remained the same.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]f the court enters a finding that some or all of the current offenses encompass the same criminal conduct then those current offenses shall be counted as one crime. Sentences imposed under this subsection shall be served concurrently.... "Same criminal conduct," as used in this subsection, means two or more crimes that require the same criminal intent, are committed at the same time and place, and involve the same victim....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“enough to be viewed as the same criminal conduct. This principle is called”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.