112 Wash. 2d 867 - State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably 115 Wash. 2d 609 - State v. Dennison (1990), 128 Wash. 2d 693 - State v. Deal (1996)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · Rose v. Clark · Leary v. United States · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen · Tot v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In any prosecution for burglary, any person who enters or remains unlawfully in a building may be inferred to have acted with intent to commit a crime against a person or property therein, unless such entering or remaining shall be explained by evidence satisfactory to the trier of fact to have been made without such criminal intent.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brunson · State v. Powell“A person who attempts to enter or remain unlawfully in a building may be inferred to have acted with intent to commit a crime against a person or property therein ... This inference is not binding upon you and it is for you to determine what weight, if any, such inference is to be given.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“A presumption is only permissible when no more than one conclusion can be drawn from any set of circumstances. An inference should not arise where there exist other reasonable conclusions that would follow from the circumstances.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.