112 Wash. 2d 882 - State v. Bartels’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Thompson v. State Dept. of Licensing (1999), 116 Wash. 2d 154 - State v. Schulze (1991)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Kirchberg v. Feenstra · 110 Wash. 2d 183 - State v. Brayman · 102 Wash. 2d 188 - State v. Kelly · 109 Wash. 2d 29 - State v. Stannard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“your refusal to take the test may be used in a criminal trial;”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“The person tested may have a physician, or a qualified technician, chemist, registered nurse, or other qualified person of his or her own choosing administer one or more tests in addition to any administered at the direction of a law enforcement officer. The failure or inability to obtain an additional test by a person shall not preclude the admission of evidence relating to the test or tests taken at the direction of a law enforcement officer.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“of his or her right to refuse the breath or blood test”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.