State v. Snedden’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 107 Wash. 2d 346 - State v. Knapstad · 125 Wash. 2d 707 - State v. Byrd · State v. Barnett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“while he remained unlawfully in the campus library. RCW 9A.52.030(1). Because the State was unable to do so, the burglary charges were properly dismissed. For that reason, I respectfully dissent. As I interpret the law, Mr. Snedden's act of exposing himself in a public area does not constitute”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Snedden“A person is guilty of indecent exposure if he intentionally makes any open and obscene exposure of his person ... knowing that such conduct is likely to cause reasonable affront or alarm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Snedden“mere apprehension may support assault as the intended crime in a burglary case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Snedden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.