Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 WASHAPP 828 - State v. Anderson

State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Chambers v. Mississippi · Williamson v. United States · 96 Wash. 2d 591 - State v. Tharp · State v. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Let me go further and add that Baranyi's statement has to be reviewed in its entirety to determine whether the circumstances provide the considerable assurance of reliability that I have alluded to, and a fair reading I think of the 62-page transcript leads to the conclusion that he lacks sufficient reliability to be admissible in those statements.[ [17] ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “So for all those reasons, looking at the statement itself in its entirety, which I know [defense counsel] takes issue with, but I do believe that's appropriate. Looking at the statement, its own internal inconsistencies... give rise to questions as to its reliability throughout.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “for purposes of the rule, and whether corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the statement's trustworthiness. Relying on Roberts, Anderson argues that the trial court erred by considering Baranyi's entire confession as his”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.