112 Wash. App. 896 - Ryan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · In Re Marriage of Littlefield · 65 Wash. App. 552 - Wheeler v. Catholic Archdiocese · Hobart v. Decker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[7] There, Blumenthal, Ausler's personal injury attorney, withdrew from her case before settlement, and filed an attorney's lien on any judgment she might receive. Ausler retained another attorney, and settled the lawsuit. In arguing that he should receive fees for the work he performed, Blumenthal claimed that he withdrew”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ryan v. State“I now have a personal injury trial in Alaska with the discovery cutoff date in September and two personal injury trials at the beginning of 2001. In addition, I have a number of criminal trials in May, June and July. My office is currently working without Mark Albrecht, who left to do public defense with S.C.R.A.P....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ryan v. State“as one of her attorneys, and Ms. Ryan was his `client' for purposes of RCW 60.40.010, et seq., [the attorney's lien statute] and his entitlement to fees was contingent in nature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ryan v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.