112 Wis. 2d 213 - State v. Gaudesi’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2015
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 96 Wis. 2d 630 - State v. Burkman · 40 Wis. 2d 223 - State Ex Rel. Evanow v. Seraphim · 75 Wis. 2d 575 - State v. Olson · 97 Wis. 2d 193 - State v. White · 85 Wis. 2d 22 - Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Who is charged?; (2) What is the person charged with?; (3) When and where did the alleged offense take place?; (4) Why is this particular person being charged?; and (5) Who says so? or How reliable is the informant?”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Reversal is only required when the evidence considered most favorably to the state and the conviction is so insufficient in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of facts acting reasonably could be convinced to that degree of certitude which the law defines as ‘beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The test under Wisconsin law of the sufficiency of the complaint is one of minimal adequacy, not in a hyper [-] technical but in a common sense evaluation, in setting forth the essential facts establishing probable cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.