Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 112 Wis. 2d 467 - State v. Bartelt

112 Wis. 2d 467 - State v. Bartelt’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert (1986), 213 Wis. 2d 131 - State v. Van Camp (1997)

27 state decisions

1201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Henderson v. Morgan · United States v. Timmreck · Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division · State v. Reppin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Pleas of guilty and no contest; withdrawal thereof. (1) Before the court accepts a plea of guilty or no contest, it shall do all of the following: , (a) Address the defendant personally and determine that the plea is made voluntarily with understanding of the nature of the charge and the potential punishment if convicted. (b) Make such inquiry as satisfies it that the defendant in fact committed the crime charged. [Emphasis added.]”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Because the fact that a defendant was told sometime earlier of his rights is not necessarily determinative of whether he understood those rights at a later time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'the plea proceedings themselves must be constitutionally acceptable or the plea may be withdrawn as a matter of right.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.