112 W. Va. 280 - Morrison v. Harmon’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas, Tex. v. Baughman · Taylor v. Johnson ex rel. A. W. & W. P. Carmichael · Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. v. Watson · Nicholson v. Combs · Bank of Moberly v. Meals
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The most effective means of preserving the integrity of such agreements is the rule that a material alteration destroys the agreement, so that no recovery can be had upon it, either in its original or its altered condition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stacey v. Fritzler““Where a negotiable instrument is materially altered without the assent of all parties liable thereon, it is avoided, except # * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stacey v. Fritzler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.