¶1Defendant’s motion papers were sufficient to raise a question of fact as to whether his identification was the product of an unlawful seizure (Dunaway v New York, 442 US 200 [1979]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.
113 A.D.3d 401
In re Denny E.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 7, 2014
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2014-01-07
Decided 2014-01-07