State v. Decello’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2014
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griffin v. California · Associated Food Retailers of Greater Chicago, Inc. v. Jewel Tea Co. · Brady v. Ohio · State v. Acosta · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . The reports of experts made pursuant to Rule 11.3 shall be made available to all parties, except that any statement or summary of the defendant’s statements concerning the offense charged shall be made available only to the defendant." (emphasis added).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“No one, no one, no one got up on this stand and testified to you contrary to what was testified to you by the witnesses ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moya
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.