State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2014 · most notably State v. Rose (1978), State v. Pyeatt (1983)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Gonzales · Black v. Industrial Commission · State Berger v. Superior Court in & for Cty, Maricopa · 25 Ariz. App. 63 - State v. Avriett · Belcher v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he court does not lose jurisdiction in a matter by ordering its dismissal before jeopardy has attached, unless there is an abuse of discretion in vacating the order of dismissal and reinstating the case for trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Nevertheless, it is clear that both the court and the prosecution intended that the dismissal be without prejudice. The prosecutor clearly intended to refile and the court understood this to be the case. An order nunc pro tunc to reflect the truth of the intention of the court at the time of the order of 25 March 1975 in case No. Cr-84638 was proper under these circumstances.” 113 Ariz. at 509 , 557 P.2d 1063 . (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Rule 8.4 Excluded The following periods shall be excluded from the computation of the time limits set forth in Rule 8.2 and 8.3; (a) Delays occasioned by or on behalf of the defendant____ (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Soto
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.