In Re Leck’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541
Relies on United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc. · Sierra Switchboard Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. · Tignor v. Parkinson · Cottrell v. Schilling · Goldburg Co. v. Salyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[notwithstanding section 541 of this title, an individual debtor may exempt from property of the estate the property listed in either paragraph (1) or, in the alternative, paragraph (2) of this subsection.... Such property is— (1) property that is specified under subsection (d) of this section, unless the State law that is applicable to the debtor under paragraph (2)(A) of this subsection specifically does not so authorize; or, in the alternative,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“relevant inquiry is no longer whether a personal injury action may be reached by a creditor’s collection efforts, but whether, in the case of a debtor electing his exemptions pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522 (b)(2), State or “other Federal law” exists pursuant to which such actions may be claimed exempt from property of the estate.... Wisconsin law contains no express constitutional or statutory exemption for personal injury causes of action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Geise
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.