113 Cal. App. 192 - Centoni v. Ingalls’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 1977
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hulbert v. California Etc. Cement Co. · 50 Cal. App. 522 - California Orange Co. v. Riverside Portland Cement Co. · 68 Cal. App. 770 - McIntosh v. Brimmer · Tuebner v. Cal. St. R.R.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A property owner is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his property free from an unlawful invasion of his rights of ownership by the act of another. Dust constitutes a nuisance if it ‘ causes perceptible injury to the property, or so pollutes the air as to sensibly impair the enjoyment thereof’. (Tuebner v. California Street R. R. Co., 66 Cal. 171 [ 4 Pac. 1162, 1164 ]; California Orange Co. v. Riverside Portland Cement Co., 50 Cal. App. 522 [ 195 Pac. 694 ] ; Hulbert v. California etc. Co., 161 Cal. 239 [38 L. R. A. .(N. S.) 436, 118 Pac. 928 ] ; McIntosh v. Brimmer, 68 Cal. App. 770 [ 230 Pac. 203 ].)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.