¶1Habeas corpus. Petitioner claims he is unlawfully imprisoned for failure to comply with an order requiring him to pay certain sums for the support and maintenance of his wife. He alleges that since the making of the order a disability to comply therewith has arisen. The petition is denied on the ground that no application for discharge has been first made "in the court below. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1143; In re Wilson, 75 Cal. 580 [17 Pac. 698].)
113 Cal. App. 254
In re Brune
Decided April 8, 1931
California Court of Appeal · decided 1931-04-08
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 1974
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relies on Wilson
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1931-04-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →