Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

113 Cal. App. 255

298 P 55

In re Gornostayoff

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1931

California Court of Appeal · decided 1931-04-08

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1931-04-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1967

3 state decisions

101931194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

THE COURT.

¶1Petition for habeas corpus.

¶2Petitioner is detained by virtue of a warrant issued by the Governor of this state, directing the extradition of petitioner to the state of Ohio. It is alleged in the petition that the Governor’s warrant is based upon an indictment filed against petitioner in the state of Ohio on the seventeenth day of November, 1927, in which said indictment petitioner is charged with having committed a felony on the fifteenth day of November, 1927, to wit: With having failed to support two minor children. Petitioner claims he was not within the demanding state on said last-mentioned date. There is no merit in the petition. Considering the character of the offense with which he is charged, his presence within the state was not necessary to enable him to commit the saíne. Petition denied.

/113/calapp/255 · .json · Public domain