113 Cal. App. 357 - Harris v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1996
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Yule v. Bishop · Stone v. Hammell · Gordon v. Wansey · James v. Yaeger · Stanley v. McElrath
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Full performance of an obligation, by the party whose duty it is to perform it, or by any other person on his behalf, and with his assent, if accepted by the creditor, extinguishes it.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Proctor v. Pyle““Performance of an obligation, by one of several persons who are jointly liable under it, extinguishes the liability of all.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Reiners v. Sherard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.