113 Cal. App. 91 - Standley v. Knapp’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 1987
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Varcoe v. Lee · Frink v. Roe · People v. Mayes · Smith v. Randall · 43 Cal. App. 425 - Williams v. Reed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The obvious purpose of the statute is to give as extended notice as the term ‘public sale’ would demand; to give notice to a sufficient number of people to insure the fairness of the sale and promote competitive bidding.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.