Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Cal. App. 2d 26 - Cheesman v. Odermott

113 Cal. App. 2d 26 - Cheesman v. Odermott’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 1998

16 state decisions

6019521960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stevens v. Oakdale Irrigation District · 16 Cal. 2d 1 - Mogle v. Moore · 73 Cal. App. 2d 692 - Fell v. M. & T. Incorporated · Reclamation Dist. No. 833 v. American F. Co. · Bryant v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellants take the position that the waters which respondents are causing to flow across the lands of appellants are waters which are artificially obtained and that therefore respondents should be enjoined from discharging the same into the stream in such quantities as to result in this water flowing across the lands of appellants. They quote from 27 Ruling Case Law 1151, section 79, a statement that under both civil and common law while water which naturally flows across land may continue to do so without subjecting the upper owner to any liability, yet the servitude which the owner of higher adjoining land has upon lower land for the discharge of surface water naturally flowing on the lower land from the dominant estate, extends only to surface water arising from natural causes such as rain and snow and cannot be augmented or made more burdensome by the acts or industry of man.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whatever the rule may be in other jurisdictions, we think that in California it has been modified to fit the necessities for a people who must depend greatly on irrigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.