113 Cal. App. 3d 1029 - Schoderbek v. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2016
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cree v. Goldstein · 4 Cal. 3d 800 - Vasquez v. Superior Court · 67 Cal. 2d 695 - Daar v. Yellow Cab Co. · 12 Cal. 3d 447 - City of San Jose v. Superior Court · 27 Cal. 3d 277 - Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Board of Equalization
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To require such detailed information in advance of the complaint would severely restrict the maintenance of appropriate class actionscontrary to recognized policy favoring them. (Code Civ. Proc., § 382 . . . .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Plaintiffs' argument overlooks the simple fact that they could have filed a claim for the refund with the county on behalf of themselves and on behalf of the members of the class they represent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to reasonably enable the public entity to make an adequate investigation of the merits of the claim and to settle it without the expense of a lawsuit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.