Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Colo. 548 - Johnson v. Hilliard

Johnson v. Hilliard’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
6
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably Frohman v. Bonelli (1949), Golleher v. Horton (1985)

2 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

12019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. Thomas · Hardy v. Carrington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The surrender of the dominion or control, in order to effect a valid gift inter vivos, includes the parting of possession and relinquishment of all control, both present and future, of the property to the extent that it is beyond the power of the donor to recall it. The surrender of control and dominion must be such that if the donor resumes control of the property without the consent of the donee, he will become a trespasser and liable to the donee as such. 38 C.J.S., Gifts, § 20 p. 799; 24 Am. Jur., p. 741 , § 22.' (Italics supplied.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(t)he word 'return' in its common and accepted use means to bring back or restore, and is a recognition of a right, ownership, dominion or control of the article in one who has not the immediate possession thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.