Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Conn. 237 - Connelly v. Deconinck

Connelly v. Deconinck’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently December 2006 · most notably Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc. (1984), Pedevillano v. Bryon (1994)

44 state decisions

26019311940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Levy v. Daniels' U-Drive Auto Renting Co., Inc. · Marshall v. Fenton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to impose upon the person who lets an automobile for hire a liability for the tortious acts of him who hires it or of anyone who comes into possession of it under the contract of hiring with the express or implied authority of the owner.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]e cannot impute to the legislature an intent, so unreasonable and of such doubtful constitutionality, to include a liability of the owner for the tortious acts of one who wrongfully acquires possession of the car from him into whose hands it came by the voluntary act of or under authority from the owner.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Any person renting or leasing to another any motor vehicle owned by him shall be liable for any damage to any person or property caused by the operation of such motor vehicle while so rented or leased, to the same extent as the operator would have been liable if he had also been the owner.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.