Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 F.1d 892 - Treat v. Tolman

Treat v. Tolman’s Empirical Analysis

113 F. 892 · 1902

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1996
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1996

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

101902191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hunt v. Rousmanier's Administrators · Boyd v. Hood · Tolman v. Treat · Smith v. Waters · Davis v. Ostrander

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"seem to be a power of attorney, within the meaning of the section relied on. It is what is known as a ‘warrant of attorney,’ and is in fact a retainer, by virtue of which an attorney at law is authorized to appear in court on behalf of a client and take certain steps as attorney in litigation to which the client is a party.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.