Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 F.2d 150 - Earll v. Picken

Earll v. Picken’s Empirical Analysis

113 F.2d 150 · 1940

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
5
states following
June 1995
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently June 1995 · most notably 89 Ill. 2d 232 - Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Zarkin (1982), Puritan Medical Center, Inc. v. Cashman (1992)

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

140194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Meinhard v. Salmon · United States v. Throckmorton · Spruill v. Ballard · Ballard v. Spruill · Holman v. Ryon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * we recognize that the defendant [Earll] may have been free, subjectively, from deliberate intention to perpetrate a fraud * * *. That he may have intended no fraud does not overcome the fact that one has been committed. He intended to do and did what the law does not permit to be done, and that is sufficient to sustain the reparation which it has been necessary to require him to make.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is elementary that a broker may not act for both parties in a transaction; and that if he does so act, he may be required to return any commissions which he has received for his services. Here Earll was acting both for himself and for plaintiff, and he must therefore restore the commission with interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.