Wyant v. Crittenden’s Empirical Analysis
113 F.2d 170 · 1940
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2018
16 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Heiskell v. Mozie · Board of Supervisors v. Prince Edward-Lunenburg County Bank · Picture Plays Theatre Co. v. Williams · Clark v. Harmer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“particularly appropriate when the party seeking to amend is permitted to proceed in forma pauperis and, because of his circumstances, does so without benefit of counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.