Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 F.2d 780 - Hanson v. Hoffman

Hanson v. Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis

113 F.2d 780 · 1940

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
March 1977
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 1977 · most notably Cohen v. United States (1942), Homovich v. Chapman (1951)

18 federal appellate · 5 district ·

1401940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 25 U.S.C. § 372 · 25 U.S.C. § 373

Relies on St.louis Smelting and Refining Company v. Kemp. · Case of Broderick's Will · Johnson v. Towsley · Steel v. St Louis Smelting Refining · Moore v. Robbins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““And, so long as the allotments and trust property remained under the administrative control of the Secretary of the Interior, he had exclusive -jurisdiction to reconsider and inquire into and set aside the approval of the will. Such right of review is the very essence of administrative authority. (Citing cases). And until the administrative control of the Secretary over the allotments and the trust property has ceased, the courts are without power to interfere with the performance by the Secretary of his administrative functions with respect thereto.” ( 113 F.2d 790 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It will be observed that under 25 U.S. C.A. § 373, supra, the death of Beniamin and the approval of the will did not free the allotments from restrictions, nor terminate the trust respecting the properties held by the Secretary. The three allotments remained restricted and the moneys derived therefrom, both before and subsequently to the death of Benjamin, and the lands conveyed to the Secretary remained subject to the trust, and to administration and control by the Secretary.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.