Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 F.2d 926 - Banks v. O'Grady

Banks v. O'Grady’s Empirical Analysis

113 F.2d 926 · 1940

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
April 1979
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 1979 · most notably Strand v. Schmittroth (1957), Stamphill v. Johnston (1943)

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

801940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ponzi v. Fessenden · United States ex rel. Demarois v. Farrell · McKee v. Johnston · Murdock v. Pollock · Mothershead v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * when a person has violated the criminal statutes of two different sovereigns, it is for the sovereigns and not the criminal to settle which shall first inflict punishment; * * * [ 113 F.2d at 927 ]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.