Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 F.2d 97 - United States v. Browder

United States v. Browder’s Empirical Analysis

113 F.2d 97 · 1940

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
September 1993
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1993

3 federal appellate ·

30194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Puerto Rico v. Shell Co. · De Lima v. Bidwell · Domingo Urtetiqui v. John N D'Arcy · Greater New York Live Poultry Chamber of Commerce v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “22. An American citizen leaving the United States for a country where pass ports are not required is nevertheless advised to carry a passport, except in travel to Canada or Mexico. The passport may later save the time and inconvenience of applying for one abroad should the holder desire to travel in countries where passports are required. It will also enable the holder to establish his American citizenship upon his return to the United States and thus facilitate his entry. American citizens who leave the United States without passports should carry with them proof of their citizenship, such as birth, baptism, or naturalization certificates.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Seo. 2. Whoever shall willfully and knowingly make any false statement in an application for passport with intent to induce or secure the issuance of a passport under the authority of the United States, either for his own use or the use of another, contrary to the laws regulating the issuance of passports or the rules prescribed pursuant to such laws, or whoever shall willfully and knowingly use or attempt to use, or furnish to another for use, any passport the issue of which was secured in any way by reason of any false statement, shall be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “My last passport was obtained from ............'.... and is submitted herewith for cancellation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.