Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 F.3d 104 - Yancey v. Gilmore

Yancey v. Gilmore’s Empirical Analysis

113 F.3d 104 · 1997

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
October 2018
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2018

13 federal appellate ·

140199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Griffin v. California · Chambers v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Comments by the prosecutor on the state of the evidence that may indirectly refer to the defendant's silence ... have not been the subject of direct Supreme Court guidance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Fifth Amendment ... forbids either comment by the prosecution on the accused's silence or instructions by the court that such silence is evidence of guilt”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.