Jang v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis
113 F.3d 1074 · 1997
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2014
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Bell · Ghaly v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Warren III v. City of Carlsbad · Kawakita v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Con-eluding that the statutory language evidenced no specific congressional intent on the precise issue in dispute, we move on to step two of the Chevron analysis.”); Yang v. INS, 79 F.3d 932 , 935 (9th Cir.) ("In the face of ambiguily or Congressional silence, we should defer to the agency’s considered judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Williams v. Babbitt“review is especially deferential in the context of immigration policy”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Friend v. Reno
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.