Arnold v. Evatt’s Empirical Analysis
113 F.3d 1352 · 1997
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Wilson v. Greene (1998), Fisher v. Angelone (1998)
27 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Wade · Kotteakos v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) ask what evidence the jury actually considered in reaching its verdict; and (2) weigh the probative force of that evidence as against the probative force of the erroneous presumption standing alone.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gilbert v. Moore · Plath v. Moore“whether potential substantial prejudice to defendant's rights inheres in the particular confrontation and the ability of counsel to help avoid that prejudice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any reasonable jury, notwithstanding the implied malice instruction, would have found malice beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gilbert v. Moore · Plath v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.