Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 F.3d 1536 - Crowe v. Coleman

Crowe v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis

113 F.3d 1536 · 1997

Citation profile

144
cited by 144 later decisions
July 2021
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 144 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Pacheco De Perez v. AT&T Co. (1998), Legg v. Wyeth (2005)

20 federal appellate · 4 district ·

6501997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Inc v. Miller Brewing Company · Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Co. · Coker v. Amoco Oil Co. · Glick v. White Motor Co. · Frank W. Parks and John Patterson v. The New York Times Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 144 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) there is no possibility the plaintiff can establish a cause of action against the resident defendant; or (2) the plaintiff has fraudulently pled jurisdictional facts to bring the resident defendant into state court.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]f there is a possibility that a state court would find that the complaint states a cause of action against any of the resident defendants, the federal court must find that the joinder was proper and remand the case to state court.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “That concessions and admissions of counsel at oral argument in appellate courts can count against them is doubtlessly true.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.