Raymer v. Enright’s Empirical Analysis
113 F.3d 172 · 1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on United States v. Salerno · Weaver v. Graham · California Department of Corrections v. Morales · Lynce v. Mathis · Jusino v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Morales Court also stated that if a drastic change of circumstances rendered a prisoner suitable for parole between hearings, an expedited hearing was possible. See 514 U.S. at 510-12 , 115 S. Ct. at 1604 . Plaintiff argues Colorado has no such provision, but apparendy neither did California; it was merely a possibility. Id. at 524 n. 9, 115 S. Ct. at 1610 n. 9 (Stevens, J., dissenting).” 113 F.3d at 175 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Branson v. McKune“An ex post facto law is 'any law which imposes a punishment for an act which was not punishable at the time it was committed; or imposes additional punishment to that then prescribed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Blue v. Klinger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.