United States v. Von Williams’s Empirical Analysis
113 F.3d 243 · 1997
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2019
8 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Greer v. Miller · Russell v. United States · Domby v. United States · Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that [the fact that a defendant] may have been arrested for something at some time is unlikely to have much impact on a District of Columbia jury.” United States v. (Eric) Williams, 324 U.S.App. D.C. 290, 294, 113 F.3d 243, 247 (1997) (discussing prejudice to defendant resulting from government witness's reference to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“increasing number of cases in which our trial judges have been overly pointed in questioning witnesses, particularly defendants,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“there was not an objection, and we do not think any error could be characterized as plain,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.