Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 F.3d 27 - United States v. Knutson

United States v. Knutson’s Empirical Analysis

113 F.3d 27 · 1997

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
October 2017
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably United States v. Gonzales (1997), United States v. Robinson (1997)

27 federal appellate · 2 district ·

250199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 5845 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · United States v. Lopez · Luster v. Cushman · Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman · Silverman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “made clear that federal Commerce Clause legislation continues to merit a high degree of judicial deference”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “did not purport to eliminate or erode well-established Commerce Clause precedents.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be unlawful for any person to transfer or possess a machine gun. (2) This subsection does not apply with respect to— (A) a transfer to or by, or possession by or under the authority of, the United States or any department or agency thereof or a State, or a department, agency, or political subdivision thereof; or (B) any lawful transfer or lawful possession of a machine gun that was lawfully possessed before the date this subsection takes effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.