Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 F.3d 595 - Rogers v. Laurain

Rogers v. Laurain’s Empirical Analysis

113 F.3d 595 · 1997

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
July 2017
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably In Re: Wayne Bell Jr, Gibson v. Gibson (In Re Gibson) (1998)

7 federal appellate · 6 district ·

280199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 365

Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · United States v. Addonizio · City of Long Beach v. Southwest Aircraft Services, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court may enlarge the time for taking action under Rule[] . . . 4003(b) . . . only to the extent and under the conditions stated in [that] rule[].”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “There simply is no room in the wording for construing Rule 4003(b) or Rule 9006(b) to permit granting an extension of time to file objections outside the original thirty day time limit.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any amendment to the list or supplemental schedules.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.