Harvey v. Hollenback’s Empirical Analysis
113 F.3d 639 · 1997
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2018
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Street v. Jc Bradford & Company · Finnegan v. Leu · Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. Lynn · White v. Turfway Park Racing Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Congress enacted Title I of the [LMRDA], 29 U.S.C. §§ 411 - 415, to provide union members with a right to freedom of expression that would in turn help ensure that unions would be democratically governed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Claims of infringement are judged by reference to the LMRDA's basic objective: to ensure that unions are democratically governed, and responsive to the will of the union members”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] claim may arise from the dismissal of a union employee or official if it were 'part of a purposeful and deliberate attempt to ... suppress dissent within the union.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.