Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 F.3d 651 - Stanback v. United States

Stanback v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

113 F.3d 651 · 1997

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
March 2016
most recently cited

41 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Triestman v. United States (1997), In re Davenport (1998)

41 federal appellate ·

370199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Bailey v. United States · Smith v. United States · Davis v. United States · Jusino v. Brown · Robinett v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “waive the right to contest whether [the] facts [which he admitted] are sufficient to constitute a crime,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Absent any evidence in that vein, only speculation will permit us to construe the mere presence of the gun on the table as the kind of ‘active employment’ that Bailey requires as a precondition to conviction for ‘use’ of the firearm.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a handgun in the sense that Bailey requires or that they handled firearms in a way that would constitute”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.