United States v. James’s Empirical Analysis
113 F.3d 721 · 1997
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably United States of America v. Noe Mancillas (1999), Hinkston v. State (2000)
36 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Batson v. Kentucky · Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty · Hernandez v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To survive a Batson challenge, unlike a challenge for cause, a peremptory strike need not be based on a strong or good reason, only founded on a reason other than race or gender.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“factual determinations under the Guidelines need not emulate the precision of Newtonian physics.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“less culpable than most other participants.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.